Olympus E-300 DSLR

Concept: 2 out of 5
Execution: 2 out of 5
Yeah, but: Solid, but not quite a classic.

The Long Version: The E-300 is the second interchangeable-lens digital SLR from Olympus, and was the "consumer" model designed to complement the E-1. Packed with eight megapixels, it was announced in the same month as the D2x, *ist, and 7D, while the D70 and 20D were already ruling the camera-store shelves. That was tough competition then, and while the E-300 was an important addition to the Olympus E-system, it didn't exactly set the world on fire.

Time has moved on since then, and it shows. Olympus wasn't be able to claim the world's fastest auto focus for many more years, the stock 14-45 kit lens is far bigger than (and optically inferior to) their later 14-42 lenses, and the odd aesthetics of the side-mirror porro-prism body will only appear on one more camera before it disappears once again. As a final coup de grace, the inspiration for that unusual design – the half-frame Pen-F – has been reincarnated as the mirrorless E-P series that has made the entire Olympus entry-level optical SLR line obsolete.

Image quality is a tough one to compare to the contemporary market. It's unfair to pick a current SLR or its successor MILF (mirrorless interchangeable lens format, naturally) camera that's had an extra six years of Moore's Law on its side. It's tempting to put the camera and 14-45mm lens up against the typical advanced compact camera, which are still more expensive than a used E-300 kit; the older Oly comes out quite well in that comparison. The E-300 may only go to iso400 without amplification, but it captures raw images and doesn't lock up in the process. Sure, it's huge, but it's a real SLR even if it is dated and slow. That still counts for something, right?

LCD size is like tree rings for digital cameras. The E-300's back is not exactly dominated by its 1.8" display, which packs 135,000 pixels into a device that gives a reasonable approximation of what the photograph looks like. According to my math, that actually gives a greater pixel density than the Nikon D80's 2.5" screen, and exceeds many current digicams as well. The menu system really doesn't suffer from the smaller-than-contemporary screen size; it shows fewer options at a time, but everything is there and organized as well as they can be. I continue to not understand the icon that represents the auto-focus confirmation beep, but perhaps that's just me.

The counterpoint to the small display is a luxurious amount of room for controls, and although the buttons themselves are small they're well spaced. The camera back also has a generous thumb rest, which couples with the bizarre ridge on the hand grip to provide a very solid hold on the camera. While some of the ergonomics are dated, the E-300 remains an easy camera to use and learn.

Anyone who already has an E-300 will know enough to either use it or retire it according to their personal preferences. Frankly, it's nowhere near the evergreen status of the E-1, which remains one of the most sublime digital cameras ever built. But the weather-sealed build of the E-1 demands good lenses, while the more pedestrian E-300 does not. When it comes time to pay the credit-card bills that can be a real advantage.

Now selling used for less than a Nikon D40, the E-300 has suffered a little more than most from the ravages of depreciation. So conversely, today it's something of a bargain for an SLR. That makes the E-300 an excellent camera for a beginning photographer who wants to get started without picking a side in the perpetual Canon v. Nikon battle. It may not be a great camera, but it is a good one and it's an excellent value. Sometimes that's enough.

last updated 26 aug 2011


  1. Not to be too pedantic ... the E-330's cousins L1 and Digilux 3 sort of count as more of the evolutionary dead end that was the side-swinging dSLR majesty that the E-300 started. I will add that the lack of a prism hump makes these a bit more portable than most dSLRs and coupled with the good-enough 25/2.8 pancake, a nice walkaround camera.

    I've seen the Konica Hexanon 40/1.8 adapted for them too but I'd be hesitant to use manual focus on these guys without an eyepiece magnifier; for some reason the E-1 and E-3 viewfinders work very well for manual focus where the L1 does not.

  2. btw the only panasonic 4/3 slr, the L10, had the same rangefinderesque viewfinder

  3. dearj, you certainly have a point about the Panasonic and Leica siblings as they were pretty much abandoned right from the start. But it's Panasonic, not Olympus, that created the "solution looking for a problem" (dpreview.com) Live View techniques that rule the world today. I have to admire the L1 and Digilux3 as groundbreaking cameras, even if they did come to market after the E-330.

    I wonder if any other brand starts discussions about which camera was more of a dead end? It feels like a typically 4/3 thing to do.

    The flat top plate is indeed awesome for being much to get in and out of a camera bag, and really does lower the profile of the camera. I'm wanting to say that I wish Olympus had kept up the efforts on this style, but of course its echoes remain in the digital Pen line. The Sony NEX-7 even retains the same eye-level viewfinder position as the E-300/330.

  4. MILFs and tree rings--Review Gold, my friend.

  5. Main advantage of E-500 and E-300 is that they pack Kodak 8 mpix sensor. With good lens and good light, they are amazing (kinda truth about E-1 too, just 3 mpix less).

    Really shame what happened to Kodak, they made best CCD sensors ever. And maybe best sensors ever.. (if you dont need high ISO).

  6. While I never quite got on with the E-300, the Kodak sensor in my E-1 really can sing. I'm hoping that the firm the equity company has created, Truesense Imaging, will continue to be a leader.

  7. Interestingly enough, the KAF-8300 CCD used in the E-300 is still listed as a currently available product on http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Image_Sensor_Solutions/Products/Full_Frame_CCD.htm (until Truesense get their own site fully operational).

    There's an interesting 2003 Application Note on http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/KODAK_Image_Sensor_Solutions_-_KAF-8300.htm that details some of the design considerations for the 4/3rds format sensors in still photography.


Thewsreviews only permits comments from its associate authors. If that's you, awesome and thanks. If not, you can find the main email address on this page, or talk to us on Twitter.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

contact me...

You can click here for Matthew's e-mail address.